David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Data.Map is a standardized interface, *not* a standardized implementation.
> I'm not saying it's a *good* standardized interface, but it's the only one
> we've got.
Not so! There is another more venerable interface, namely Data.FiniteMap.
That interface was deleted in favour of Data.Map, for no good reason
that I am aware of. Indeed, I still have several pieces of software
that continue to use the FiniteMap interface, but now have an extra
home-grown indirection layer to connect to the current Data.Map
implementation, just to enable the software to build.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
