Hi Chris,
> this could be captured nicely in a where clause:
>
> exp = (fst blah, snd blah) where blah = gg 1000
>
> But a let would have to be placed in both elements of the tuple
>
> exp = (let blah = g 1000 in fst blah, let blah = g 1000 in snd blah)
Why not:
exp = let blah = g 1000
in (fst blah, snd blah)
Where's always get desugared to let's, so where's are never more efficient.
Thanks
Neil
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
