Laurent Deniau wrote:
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
And you still need to think about where you have to introduce delays
to avoid infinite loops?
I don't see why, unless you want to have a memory or explicitly stop
the time which means it's a parameter of the transition as mention
above (but instantaneous transitions seems strange). So, the causality
of the transitions with a discrete time should not lead to infinite
loops. The time delay exists de facto.
I'm currently reading "FRP, Continued". Maybe I got confused by the text
on page 56, which introduces a delay (noEvent --> addOrDelCTs) to avoid
an infinite loop.
Since nobody replied yet on my question about the future of (A)FRP,
maybe I can ask it again here? What is the future for FRP? Are other
approaches better suitable for reactive applications?
I missed your question, but it's an interesting question. I found very
interesting and instructive the paper of Hai Liu and Paul Hudak on the
problem of space leaks in FRP.
Yes that is a very interesting paper, but since I'm still trying to
understand and use Yampa, I will have to re-read the paper. It would be
nice if Paul Hudak wrote a "Haskell HIGH School of Expression" book,
explaining Yampa, because I really enjoyed the SOE book.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
