On Nov 21, 2007 5:59 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. We absolutely must not conflate GHC releases with QA-stamped library > bundles. The latter would be great, but the two must be separate. (For > reasons given by others in this thread.)
Someone in a previous thread made an analogy between GHC and the linux kernel. I imagine that third-party Haskell distributions, consisting of GHC/Hugs/whatever and some bundled packages, would meet the desire for a "batteries included" Haskell implementation without tying the most popular libraries to GHC releases. -- Dave Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
