On 11/25/07, Thomas Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'm running into more or less the same issue discussed at > > http://bloggablea.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/haskell-records-considered-grungy/ > > Just wondering if I missed anything, or if any of the ideas > considering better records setter/getters have been implemented in the > meantime.
Have a look at [http://code.haskell.org/category], and the associated blog posts http://twan.home.fmf.nl/blog/haskell/overloading-functional-references.details (http://tinyurl.com/2ustba) and http://twan.home.fmf.nl/blog/haskell/References-Arrows-and-Categories.details (http://tinyurl.com/2v8het) which discuss "functional references" (similar to Luke's), and include Template Haskell code for deriving more flexible accessors from a record declaration. Also check out HList [http://homepages.cwi.nl/~ralf/HList/], which can do some interesting things, provided you're willing to abandon the built-in record system. Stuart _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
