2007/12/13, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > > Hello Duncan, > > > > Thursday, December 13, 2007, 4:43:17 PM, you wrote: > > > >> Use just the GHC bit from the code I pointed at: > > > > thank you, Duncan. are there any objections against simplest code > > proposed by Yitzchak? i.e. > > > > (_, h, _, _) <- runInteractiveCommand "script params" > > output <- hGetContents h > > > > taking into account that bad-behaved scripts are not my headache? > > It could deadlock if the script produces enough stderr to fill up its pipe > buffer, because the script will stop waiting for your program to empty the > pipe. > > It's been said several times, but we should really have a higher-level > abstraction over runInteractiveProcess.
I think Don started something: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/newpopen/ David _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
