That's not C.
That's the C preprocessor, which is a textual substitution macro language.

Well, the preprocessor is part of the language in a way. These two come
together.

No. In fact, these are even two different programs, see man cpp.

Macros certainly aren't first class (you can't pass a macro to a function, only its expansion).

In Haskell I cannot pass a function to a function, only its expansion.

What do you mean by "expansion"? Can you clarify this?

C does support function pointers, which are something like first class functions. The main things C lacks which people associate with true first-class function is:

The ability to construct anonymous/local functions.

If you look at the example you will see I've done that.

No. Your "compose" macro is not a function; for example, you can't use it as an argument to itself (which is easy in Haskell: (.)(.))

The ability to capture local variables and return a function with some variables bound.

If I can construct "anonymous" functions and "constants", I can construct
functions with some variables bound.

See above. You can't.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to