Good to know. I intended to use Haskell for algorithms, but it seems it is
not so good at them.
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:52:19 +0200, Jonathan Cast
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2007, at 9:47 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
I don't know. I'm a beginner in Haskell, and I down't know about T.
You mean they cannot ?
I was under the impression that the purpose of computers cannot be
fulfiled if we cannot get the result of computations out of the
computers.
Haskell is not a computer programming language; Haskell
implementations are not required to run on computers. Haskell is a
formal notation for computation (completely unrelated to the Von
Neuman machine sitting on your desk). It can be implemented on Von
Neuman machines, because they are still universal Turing machines,
but it is /not/ a radical attack on the problem of programming
peripherals!
I suppose it can run on pebbles.
Any language can be emulated on pebbles; unlike most languages,
Haskell can be compiled directly to them.
jcc
I know, and in this case one doesn't need IO.
The result is a nice collection of asorted pebbles.
Which is why Haskell treats IO as a domain specific language.
jcc
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
