2008/1/16, Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, David Waern wrote: > > > Changes in version 2.0.0.0: > > > > * The GHC API is used as the front-end > > It's great to see this progress in Haddock. However, is Haddock now more > difficult to port than before?
Haddock is already ported to the GHC API, the wiki-page needs updating. > Is there some bug- and feature request > tracker for Haddock? I only know of > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haddock/Development_ideas > and the first big point seems to be finished now. There is no bug-tracker yet. When community.haskell.org provides Trac, we might use that. For now, we're using the TODO file in the darcs repo (code.haskell.org/haddock). > I like to have the following enhancements: > > * Optionally show qualifications of identifiers, that is print > "Sequence.map" rather than "map", "Music.T" rather than just "T". The > option for haddock could be > --qualification QUAL > QUAL=none (default) strip off qualification (just "map") > QUAL=orig show the identifiers as they are written in the module > (e.g. "map" or "List.map") > QUAL=full show all identifiers with full qualification > (Data.List.map) > Actually I tried to implement it by myself in the old Haddock, but I > could not precisely identify the place, where the qualification is > removed. > > * Documentation of arguments of type constructors other than 'top level' > arrows. E.g. > T (a {- ^ arg -} -> b {- ^ result -} ) > (a {- ^ arg -} -> b {- ^ result -} ) -> c > (a {- ^ x coord -}, b {- ^ y coord -}) -> c > It's probably difficult to format properly in HTML. > I've added these to the TODO file. Thanks, David _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
