It's a matter of taste. I prefer the function composition in this case. It reads nicely as a pipeline.
-- Lennart On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Dan Licata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not to start a flame war or religious debate, but I don't think that > eta-expansions should be considered bad style. I realize that > composition-style is good for certain types of reasoning, but fully > eta-expanded code has an important legibility advantage: you can tell > the shape of its type just by looking at it! Personally, I'd rather > read the original version. > > -Dan > > On Feb01, Derek Elkins wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 00:09 -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Today on #haskell, resiak was asking about a clean way to write the > > > function which allocates an array of CStrings using withCString and > > > withArray0 to produce a new with* style function. I came up with the > > > following: > > > > > > nest :: [(r -> a) -> a] -> ([r] -> a) -> a > > > nest xs = runCont (sequence (map Cont xs)) > > > > This is what you write after all that time on #haskell? > > > > nest = runCont . sequence . map Cont > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
