Ok, I'll leave it up there as a separate package then. :) -- Don
hitesh.jasani: > Don, > > It's tempting, but I would really hate to lose nano-md5 as it is > today. I thought your concept was a great idea to inspire people to > start small to get a feel for developing Haskell libraries. The > current nano-md5 serves as a really good example. > > In the Ruby community there are many small libraries that do one, > simple focused task. There are times when this is a virtue over > libraries that try to be all encompassing. It's weird but I would > have thought the Haskell community would have more embraced small > libraries also since they may be more composable. > > - Hitesh > > > On Feb 11, 2008 4:29 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hitesh.jasani: > > > nano-hmac provides bindings to OpenSSL's HMAC interface. With this > > > release the > > > set of hashing functions supported is: MD5, SHA, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, > > > SHA384, > > > SHA512. > > > > > > If you're unfamiliar with HMAC's then you may want to check out the > > > second link > > > below where I explain a little bit about them in a blog entry. > > > > > > The hackage pages mentioned that they're not running haddock 2.0, so I > > > don't > > > know if the docs will generate. If not, you can see the docs online at > > > the > > > third link below. > > > > > > * > > > http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/nano-hmac-0.2.0 > > > * http://www.jasani.org/2008/02/nano-hmac-020-released.html > > > * http://docs.jasani.org/nano-hmac/0.2.0/ > > > > > > Any and all comments/suggestions/criticisms/fortune-cookie-proverbs are > > > welcome. > > > > > > > Shall we merge nano-md5 into this lib, and deprecate nano-md5 itself? > > Seems like a good time to consolidate, and produce a single openssl > > binding. > > > > -- Don > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
