On Feb 20, 2008 12:48 PM, Chad Scherrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > StorableVector should fill this gap. > > http://code.haskell.org/~sjanssen/storablevector/ > > > > Yes, it could, but > (1) it's way behind ByteString in terms of optimizations (== "fusion") > (2) there's (as far as I know) not a StorableVector.Lazy, which is very much > needed > > To catch up on both fronts, we're looking at a lot of duplicate code.
For anyone looking into it - the StorableVector fusion would have to be quite different from the current ByteString fusion framework. Maybe it would be enough to lay down a Stream fusion framework for StorableVectors. -Antoine _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
