On 24/02/2008, Chaddaï Fouché <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/2/24, Rodrigo Queiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > That said, I vote to keep the solutions (providing they are written by the > > page editor) since IMO they do no harm. > > > I agree with this (I personally contributed some small solutions and > tried to at least comment them a minimum), but I noticed a smartass > replaced valid solutions by references to the sequences dictionary... > As the goal of PE is to solve the question by program (at least in my > understanding), I feel this qualify as vandalism... especially as the > program replaced whatever their value were in Haskell whereas the > sequence dictionary has no relation to Haskell. >
I encourage you to put your solutions back up, that would be good. Referencing OEIS is a bit of a cheesy way to do things. (Though if it's going to be done, one could at least make use of the excellent Math.OEIS library :) - Cale _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe