On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Alfonso Acosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, considering how often is (putStrLn.show) used, it is surprising > that there is no Ln variant for print (just like it happens with > putStr and putStrLn)
Actually, > print = putStrLn . show so > outputLines i = mapM_ print [1..i] -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
