On Thu April 17 2008 7:01:18 am Ross Paterson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:45:40AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > My local haddock, 0.8, parses this file fine. Is Hackage running and > > older version? Could it be upgraded? Or is there something else going > > on here? > > No, it's running haddock 2.1.0, which understands all the GHC > extensions, but is more picky about comments.
OK. I have been able to replicate this behavior with Haddock 2.0.0.0, which is the latest according to www.haskell.org/haddock. Where did 2.1.0 come from? Although I can replicate the behavior, I can't explain it. My reading of the Haddock docs leads me to believe I have done the correct thing. Is this a bug in Haddock or am I missing something? Is there some different syntax for a "type" declaration that defines an alias for a function? -- John _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
