Luke Palmer wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Coppin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yitzchak Gale wrote:
And of course, you wouldn't want that:
f xs = xs : map expensiveCalculation xs
Please don't fuse those two loops into one.
...doesn't type check. Did you mean (++)?
Hmm? While the name might be misleading...
expensiveCalculation = (:[])
Ah. So f :: [x] -> [[x]]. Devious...
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
