Hello Andrew, Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 10:37:47 PM, you wrote: >> looks like lazy.bytestring generalized to any a > That sounds like a darn useful thing to have...
well, support on only Word8 as base type isn't some fundamental limit, just creators of bytestring package was not very interested in support of other base types > [OTOH, currently unboxed arrays are available only for a select few > types, so good luck implementing this in a clean way!] a few years ago, storable array was slower than special primitives created for UArray implementation. now they should have equal performance, so it's possible to make UArray implementation that will work with any Storable type. Simon, can you please confirm or refute this? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
