Robert Vollmert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Great reply!
Thanks. > One minor point: If real_programme is to be pure, you should use let: Whoops! I was thinking "let" but wrote the wrong thing. If my email had been through a type-checker, it would have spotted the mistake. -- Jón Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2008-04-26) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
