On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tim Newsham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So am I understanding you correctly that you believe this is not > a bug? That the use Data.Binary.decodeFile function leaks a file > descriptor and this is proper behavior?
I think he might be saying that decodeFile is not the place for checking this condition. I will put words in his mouth and say that checking for EOF after a decode is the responsibility of the application code, because the lower level cannot possibly know whether it makes sense for there to be residual data in the ByteString. There are plenty of file formats that consist of back-to-back concatenated chunks of data, in which reading just one chunk does not by any means require that a file can only contain one. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
