Thanks, So you're recommending:
text (concat [a,b,c,d,e]) Might this not transform my pretty printing into ugly printing; when longer strings are used? Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Van Enk Sent: Fri 15/08/2008 14:31 To: Paul Keir Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Pretty Print, text or ++? Paul, Something tells me you might want to look at `concat': concat :: [[a]] -> [a] /jve 2008/8/15 Paul Keir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi there, > > I'm writing a pretty printer using the Text.PrettyPrint library, and > there's a pattern I'm coming across quite often. Does anyone know whether, > > text (a ++ b ++ c ++ d) > or > text a <+> text b <+> text c <+> text d > > runs quicker? > > Cheers, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > -- /jve
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
