2008/8/26 Deborah Goldsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It sounds like the properties you want are "Case" and "General Category". > Maybe the spec should be more explicit on exactly how the definitions map > onto Unicode properties, so there is no ambiguity.
This is proposed for Haskell'. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/UnicodeInHaskellSource says: "The report should at least be absolutely clear about which Unicode character properties (N, Ll, Lu, Sm, etc.) correspond to which lexical class in the syntax." I don't know if there's any difference in how current Haskell compilers handle this. Andy _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
