igouy2: > > dons: > > > (Where I note GHC is currently in second place, though we've not > > submitted any parallel programs yet). > > We might call that the thread-ring effect :-) > > > > Also CC'd Isaac, Mr. Shootout. Isaac, is the quad core shootout > > open for business? Should we rally the troops? > > iirc there was some discussion after the last GHC release about > cleaning up the programs to make them less low-level given the improved > capabilities of the compiler - I don't think that ever happened, and > "low level" seems to be a common complaint against the Haskell programs > shown in the benchmarks game. > > As Simon Peyton-Jones suggested we're certainly open for suggestions: > > http://groups.google.com/group/fa.haskell/browse_thread/thread/7eb82c689de8688/4f3c47b976394666?lnk=st&q=alioth+shootout#4f3c47b976394666 > > However, we're operating new measurement scripts on both u64q > (published) and gp4 (unpublished), and my focus is still on catching up > to where we were with measurements from the old scripts, and installing > third-party libraries on u64q.
So still consolidating the system. Do I understand though, that if we submit, say, a quad-core version of binary-trees, for example, using `par` and -N4, it'll go live on the benchmark page? -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
