Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
This seems fine to me. It's based on something that already does work properly across a process scope,
But you agree that IORefs define a concept of "process scope"?
instead of some new language feature that is actually hard to implement across the process scope.
If we have a concept of "process scope", how is it hard to implement? -- Ashley Yakeley _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
