wchogg:
> To ask an overly general question, if lazy bytestring makes a nice
> provider for incremental processing are there reasons to _not_ reach
> for that as my default when processing large files?

At the moment, it would always be my first choice. Consider,

    http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=sumcol&lang=all

-- Don
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to