Anton van Straaten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Achim Schneider wrote: > > "Rich Neswold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Manlio Perillo > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > ... > >>> But this works only if the database is used by only one process. > >>> > >> Ah. When you said "concurrent safe", I thought you meant within the > >> application. You're looking for something like > >> this<http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/anydbm> > >> . > >> > > Or even HApps-State (http://happs.org/) for moar 0v3rk1ll, of which > > you can never ever have enough. > > HAppS-State doesn't currently solve the problem of the database being > used by more than one process (does it?) In the current stable > version, it basically maintains its data in-memory and keeps a > checkpointed transaction log. > After watching the BayFP presentation I assumed that they've got cross-master synchronising going, and that's nearly a year old news now. Merely synchronising processes is trivial if you can do that.
If the HAppS documentation wasn't as lacking as it is or I'd have more time, I would know more about this. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
