On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 18:45 +0200, Thomas Davie wrote: > On 26 Sep 2008, at 17:51, Jonathan Cast wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:17 +0200, Thomas Davie wrote: > >> On 26 Sep 2008, at 12:12, Janis Voigtlaender wrote: > >> > >>> Manlio Perillo wrote: > >>>> When I compare GPL and MIT/BSD licenses, I do a simple reasoning. > >>>> Suppose a doctor in a battle field meet a badly injuried enemy. > >>>> Should he help the enemy? > >>> > >>> I'm so glad I don't understand this ;-) > >> > >> Should you decide not to give someone something based on the fact > >> that > >> you either don't like them, or don't like what they'll do with the > >> thing you give them. > > > > I think the standard answer to your question is that you get the enemy > > to *surrender* first, patch him up enough to move him, and then stick > > him in a POW camp for the duration, or until you get something in > > return > > for releasing him. > > > > I would never patch someone up so he can go back to *shooting* at > > me, or > > my friends. Never. > > Yet doctors all abide by the hypocratic(sp?) oath.
Really? Even medics? Got any evidence of that? jcc _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe