On 2008 Sep 30, at 17:59, Derek Elkins wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
noteed:
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of
the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to
them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them
together
with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not,
would
you do it again ?
It made the structuring and invariants between runtime data, and
configuration data clean and precise. Yes, A+++ would buy again.
xmonad is a little too alive to be doing postmortems yet
I was wondering what he knew that the rest of us didn't....
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
