On 2008.10.06 21:19:17 -0400, John Van Enk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled 4.3K characters: > Hmm... > > I like Securry, but I'm going to go ahead and shorten it to Scurry. > I also like HaPN a lot. > > Any suggestions why either of these would be better than the other? > Perhaps a third party > candidate would be more appropriate? > > So... > 1. Scurry > 2. HaPN > 3. ??? > > (bah, sorry Brandon, reply all, reply all reply all...)
Scurry has my vote. It is cute, it implies the software is busy and useful, it has the requisite subtle FP joke, and it doesn't seem to be already used. -- gwern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
