On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ryan Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You may think it doesn't matter, because you could instantiate it to > anything after the fact, but it's possible that the result of the case > statement depends on the choice of instantiation for sy; consider if > sy had an additional constraint: > > > Sealed (fromInteger) :: forall t. Num t => Sealed ((->) Integer) > > Now the result of the case statement is the concrete implementation of > fromInteger for whatever type it gets instantiated at. Thanks, I was indeed hoping to see examples of things that break if the type checker behaved the way I wanted. Jason
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe