Andrew Coppin wrote: > apfelmus wrote: >> ... and a solution to a problem that you souldn't have in the first >> place. I mean, if you want to construct XML or SQL statements, you ought >> to use an abstract data type that ensures proper nesting etc. and not a >> simple string. >> > > Right. And if you have 25 KB of HTML data, you're *really* going to > transform all of that into an abstract data type just to avoid injection > problems, right?
Yes. "Just" an injection problem is an understatement. And its the implementation of the abstract data type that determines how fast things are. Who said that it may not simply be a newtyped String ? Regards, apfelmus _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
