On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:08:29PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > dagit: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I wanted to know if anyone who is using distros with 6.6 need to be > > >> able to build current releases of darcs from source. > > > > > > If there turns out to be a significant issue with Darcs 1, I need to be > > > able to build a recent version of Darcs in my Debian stable chroot. > > > > I see. If you're using the darcs 1 binary I would encourage you to > > upgrade. If you meant darcs 1 repository format then I would > > encourage you to consider darcs 1 hashed repository format. You don't > > even have to upgrade the public facing repo. Just 'darcs get --hashed > > ...'. > > > > > The alternative is to build a static version of Darcs that I can install > > > on > > > my stable (soon to be oldstable) servers. Last time I checked, building > > > static Darcs didn't work. > > > > Interesting. Yes, building darcs statically is something we should > > probably do on the build bots. > > Statically linked darcs should be trivial with the cabal version.
The bug is in debian's libcurl. David _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
