John Lato wrote:
I would love to see a perfect, unified array library in Haskell.  I
think everyone would.  However, the problem Don, Roman, and others
have raised is that there is no single consensus on what that library
would look like, or how it would be implemented.  It might be
impossible for one library to fill the entire design space.  Don's
point is that, since this isn't yet a solved problem, having multiple
implementations available to see what works well (and what doesn't) is
a necessary step in finding a solution.

Interesting. I thought this was more or less a solved problem, it's just that nobody has yet had time to implement it all.

I mean, the Haskell '98 array libraries are OK, they're just rather incomplete. We could do with the ability to have unboxed arrays of arbitrary types. (Remember, this is the default position in Pascal / C / C++ / most normal programming languages - although admittedly they don't have ADTs.) It would be useful to have the option to dispence with Ix. (And bounds checks, if you're sure you don't need them.) It would also be useful to be able to "slice" arrays. And we have the new parallel-array stuff coming now, but (AFAIK) it's fairly nontrivial to switch between normal arrays and parallel ones. Plus there are lots and lots of "obvious" and useful functions that aren't in the libraries. (E.g., in-place map for mutable arrays.) It seems silly to reimplement these every time you want to do something; they should be in the libraries.

I doubt there will ever be a "perfect" library for anything. But that doesn't mean we can't take a few steps in the right direction. ;-)

I also think this is a exactly why Hackage needs a way to indicate
that packages are deprecated/superceded by other packages.  There was
some talk about this recently, and IIRC even a submitted patch.  I
hope that gets adopted soon.

Agreed.

This goes beyond array libraries; do you have any idea how many "binary" packages there are?

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to