I have actually been thinking about a similar thing, but on the "group" subject. One can actually group things in many ways, such as groupBy (==) , so that groupBy (==) [1,2,1,2] should give [[1,1],[2,2]]. Of course other ideas are possible.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brent Yorgey <byor...@seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Gianfranco Alongi wrote: >> A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain >> the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal. >> That is, add the same explanation you give every time; but to the >> page. > > Good idea; I've added a list of possible ways to split, both to give > people ideas for code to write, and to demonstrate why it's impossible > to come up with one 'best' split function. > > vixey has already added some code, but we need more! > > -Brent > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- Patience is the last resort for those unable to take action _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
