Jules Bean <ju...@jellybean.co.uk> writes: > So I agree with Ashley insofar as, there is no *need* for the logo to > incorporate a lambda or a >> or suchlike devices.
> On the other hand, I think it's not necessarily a bad thing either, as > long as it works with (1) and (2) above. I agree with this, but would also add that referring to foundations, history or theory (lambda) is better than referring to syntax (>>). I don't know if it was proposed as a serious option, but I quite like the idea of using _|_ as a symbol. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
