Ah. That explains my confusion. But isn't that ambiguous terminology? There must be some reason for it to be that way? On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <[email protected]>wrote:
> The term 'currying' means both of these things: > - Converting an uncurried function to a 'curriable' one > - Partially applying a 'curriable' function > > 2009/1/13 Peter Verswyvelen <[email protected]>: > > On page 102: "partial function application is named currying" > > > > > > > > I thought "currying" or "to curry" means converting > > > > > > > > f :: (a,b) ->c > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > g :: a -> b -> c > > > > > > > > by applying "curry" (mmm, are Asian people good at Haskell? :-) > > > > > > g = curry f > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
