>>> As an example:
>>> foo = u"abc\N{VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF}"
>>
>> Hmm, looks nice, and sensible. But as soon as you've got \N{....} syntax I
>> want:
>>
>> "foo\E{show i}bar"
>>
>> i.e. embed expressions in strings. I think this would be fantastic.
>
> why not simpy "foo\E{i}bar" ?
What if i is a string? You'd get: foo"i"bar
Having different behaviour for string vs everything else would be equally bad.
>> joinPath' root name = import.System.FilePath.joinPath [root,name]
>>
>> i.e. doing an import and use at the same time.
>
> and why not simply System.FilePath.joinPath (without the import.) ?
That is the same as saying everything is always in scope but fully
qualified. I'd rather have to explicitly say which modules were being
used - I'm not sure my enhanced import idea is a good idea at all.
Thanks
Neil
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
