2009/1/14 Tim Wawrzynczak <[email protected]>: > The reason the macro is better is that the length of the list is known at > compile time, so you don't need to traverse the list to calculate the length > of the list.
Or you could use a real compiler (perhaps even a glorious one) that does constant folding when the list length is constant, but have your function still work when it isn't constant. --Max _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
