> How does forcing them to learn proposed terminology such as `Appendable' > help here? Learners of Haskell do still need to learn what the new word > means.
The contention is that 'Appendable' is an intuitive naming that people will already have a rudimentary grasp of. This as opposed to Monoid, which absolutely requires looking up for the average coder. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
