On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 13:36 -0800, David Leimbach wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:16 AM, david48 <dav.vire+hask...@gmail.com> > wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Leimbach > <leim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So you're saying it should be better documented in Haskell > what a Monoid is. > > Did you say you searched for "C++ class" why not "Haskell > Monoid" then? > > The first correct google hit that didn't think I meant > Monads, takes you > > straight to the GHC documentation for Data.Monoid. > > Read my first post on the thread, that's exactly what I did > ( and then > complained that the doc for Data.Monoid was close to useless ) > > > Sorry missed it! This is an exceptionally long thread! :-) I agree > Data.Monoid's docs don't give you much to work with.
Do you think they look better now: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/libraries/base/Data-Monoid.html Any other improvements you'd make? Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe