On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:20 PM, ChrisK <[email protected]>wrote:
> Since this is strict there is no laziness and the code must evaluate the > input and output "State RealWorld" to ensure they are not bottom or error. > Interesting. I also thought it was the passing of the RealWorld that caused the sequencing, I never realized that the strictness played an important role here. So what would happen if it would be lazy instead of strict? What kind of craziness would occur?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
