Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 09:30 schrieb Aaron Denney: > On 2009-02-19, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org> wrote: > > In addition, I wouldn’t include algebraic structures in a > > *numerical* prelude since the cool thing about them is that they are > > so abstract that they are not only about numbers. > > But the thing is that to have the numerical classes support the proper > abstractions we want them to support, we need to define the algebraic > structures as well. So the rework goes together...
Of course! It’s just that having algebraic structures in a separate algebra package is in my opinion a better idea than having them in a numeric prelude. Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
