Martijn van Steenbergen <[email protected]> wrote: > f x y = bam x y > This would introduce another matching of x on the outside of bam, and I don't know if this works without significantly messing with e.g. strictness.
-- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
