Duncan Coutts <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, grouping is the one where I most often find the need for head or > partial patterns. The function group produces a list of non-empty lists > but that is not reflected in the type. On the other hand, actually > reflecting it in the type would make it more awkward: > > group :: Eq a => [a] -> [(a,[a])]
group :: Eq a => [a] -> [(a,Int)] ? This is often what I want anyway :-) Of course, this only works for sane Eq instances. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
