All very neat, and it works! Thanks. But I copied
map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] <== I'm assuming this is correct from something called "A Tour of the Haskell Prelude" at http://undergraduate.csse.uwa.edu.au/units/CITS3211/lectureNotes/tourofprelude.html#all which I was looking at to try and roll my own typing. My next question: My function s f ls seems much like map f ls but instead looks like s :: (a -> a -> a) -> [a] -> [a] Clearly, there's more to the picture than meets the eye. Is there a good tutorial on types? Michael --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Joe Fredette <[email protected]> wrote: From: Joe Fredette <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Sequence differences To: "michael rice" <[email protected]>, "haskell Cafe mailing list" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:07 AM So, we can walk through it- > s f [] = [] > s f [x] = [x] > s f l = [ a f b | (a,b) <- zip (init l) (tail l)] First, we can write some of it to be a little more idiomatic, viz: s _ [] = [] s _ [x] = [x] s f ls = [f a b | (a,b) <- zip (init ls) (tail ls)] First, we have a function type, we can tell the variable f is a function because it's applied to arguments in the third case, since it's applied to two arguments, it's binary, so `s :: (a -> b -> c) -> ?` however, from the second case, we know that whatever the type of the second argument (a list of some type `a1`) is also the type of the return argument, since the `s` acts as the identity for lists of length less than 2, so s :: (a -> b -> a1) -> [a1] -> [a1] However, since the arguments for `f` are drawn from the same list, the argument types must _also_ be of type `a1`, leaving us with: s :: (a -> a -> a) -> [a] -> [a] This is, interestingly enough, precisely the type of foldr1. We can write your original function in another, cleaner way though, too, since zip will "zip" to the smaller of the two lengths, so you don't need to worry about doing the init and the tail, so `s` is really: s _ [] = [] s _ [x] = [x] s f ls = [f a b | (a,b) <- zip ls (tail ls)] but there is a function which does precisely what the third case does, called "zipWith" which takes a binary function and two lists and -- well -- does what that list comprehension does. In fact, it does what your whole function does... In fact, it _is_ your function, specialized a little, eg: yourZipWith f ls = zipWith f ls (tail ls) Hope that helps /Joe michael rice wrote: > I have a Scheme function that calculates sequence differences, i.e., it > returns a sequence that is the difference between the 2nd and the 1st > element, the 3rd and the 2nd, the 4th and the 3rd, etc. > > (define s > (lambda (f l) > (cond ((null? (cdr l)) '()) > (else (cons (f (cadr l) (car l)) > (s f (cdr l))))))) > > where > > (s - '(0,1,3,6,10,15,21,28)) => (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) > > > I'm thinking the same function in Haskell would be something like > > s :: > s f [] = [] > s f [x] = [x] > s f l = [ a f b | (a,b) <- zip (init l) (tail l)] > > > but can't figure out what the function typing would be. > > Michael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
