I will add myself a million times then :-)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello Peter,
>
> Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 2:42:24 PM, you wrote:
>
> if you need win64 ghc version - add yourself to CC list of
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1884
>
> > Well, make that 2! :-)
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Bulat Ziganshin
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  Hello Peter,
> >
> >  Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 12:58:25 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >  No. it seems that i'm only user asking GHC team for 64-bit version
> >
>
>  >> Regarding that, is it possible to generate 64-bit code using GHC on
> Windows?
> >
>  >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM, FFT <[email protected]> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Karel Gardas <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>   >>>
>   >>> Hello,
>   >>>
>   >>> perhaps you are hit by following issue?
>   >>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/594
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> The benchmark isn't using the native code generator, it compiles via
>  >>  C, as I understand.
>  >>
>  >>  What are other people's timings on 32 bit Linux machines?
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >>  Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>  >>  [email protected]
>  >>  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>  >>
> >
> >
>  >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >  Best regards,
> >   Bulat                            mailto:[email protected]
> >
> >
>
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Bulat                            mailto:[email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to