Ross Paterson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 06:46:24PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Ross Paterson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:47:23PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: >>>> I'm not sure why building of my recently uploaded version of dataenc >>>> fails to build on Hackage[1]. Where can I find out what version of base >>>> is available on Hackage? >>> The build client uses ghc 6.10.2 (including base 4.1.0.0). I'm not sure >>> why base went up a major version number between minor releases of GHC. >> Ah, that explains the failure to build. >> >> Does your second comment mean that it's safe to put the version limits >> to ">= 4.0.0 && < 4.2"? > > The upper bound will be fine now, but I don't know what version of base > will be released with GHC 6.10.3. Shouldn't the lower bound be 4.0.0.0?
I'll put it as <4.2 then, for now. Well, if I understand the proposed package versioning policy[1], then A.B.C is equivalent to a specific API. /M [1]: http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe Haskell is an even 'redder' pill than Lisp or Scheme. -- PaulPotts
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
