On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 15:05 +0100, Neil Davies wrote: > Duncan > > That was my first thought - but what I'm looking for is some > confirmation from those who know better that treating the GC as > 'statistical source' is a valid hypothesis. If the thing is 'random' > that's fine - if its timing is non-deterministic, that's not fine. > > So GC experts are there any hints you can give me? - are there any > papers that cover this timing aspect? and are there any corner cases > that might make the statistical approach risky? (or at worse invalid).
I suggest you repost this question on the ghc users mailing list as -cafe is a bit high volume sometimes for the ghc hackers to keep up with. Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
