Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 11:05:05 schrieb Magnus Therning: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ashok Gautham > > <scriptdevil.hask...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I feel that the haskell mailing lists must have the reply-to field set, > > so that a person can reply to the list by just clicking reply. > > > > I am unsure if I am the only one facing this problem. > > This is a contentious issue: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
May I add http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html > > I personally think mailing-lists shouldn't put themselves in the > Reply-To, and that easy replying to the list is something that should > be handled in the mail client (I base my choice of mail client on > this). Indeed. I have reply, reply-to-all and reply-to-list one click or one key combination away, and as far as I know those features are present in almost all mail clients since several years, so ease of replying to list shouldn't be an issue. On the other hand, I do not want messages intended to be private communications to end up on the list, which would happen more easily with munged headers. So, count me in the leave-reply-to-alone camp. > > What client are you using? > > /M Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe