On May 18, 2009, at 20:54 , Claus Reinke wrote:
As I said, I don't get the fusion if I just add the function above
to the original Dist.hs, export it and compile the module with '-c
-O2 -ddump-simpl':
I can't reproduce this.
Interesting. I'm using ghc 6.11.20090320 (windows), uvector-0.1.0.3.
I attach the modified Dist.hs and its simpl output, created via:
ghc -c Dist.hs -O2 -ddump-tc -ddump-simpl-stats -ddump-simpl >
Dist.dumps
Perhaps others can confirm the effect? Note that the 'dist_fast' in
the same module does get fused, so it is not likely an options
issue. I still suspect that the inlining of the 'Dist.zipWith'
wrapper in the 'dist_fast_inlined'
'__inline_me' has some significance - it is odd to see inlined code
in an
'__inline_me' and the fusion rule won't trigger on 'Dist.sumU . Dist.
$wzipWithU',
right?
As far as I can tell, the dist_fast_inlined doesn't get fused, i.e.
I'm seeing
zipWithU and sumU being used in it, which is not the case in dist_fast.
This is on OS X/PowerPC, using GHC 6.10.1.
Does the complete program fragment I posted earlier yield the desired
result?
Yes. Note that the original poster also reported slowdown from
use of 'dist_fast_inlined'.
Don, you were defining dist inside the main module, while in our
case the dist functions are defined in a seperate Dist.hs module...
Would that matter?
K.
--
Kenneth Hoste
Paris research group - ELIS - Ghent University, Belgium
email: kenneth.ho...@elis.ugent.be
website: http://www.elis.ugent.be/~kehoste
blog: http://boegel.kejo.be
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
