Don Stewart wrote: > duncan.coutts: >> What we're currently missing is a PVP checker: a tool to compare APIs of >> package versions and check that it is following the PVP. Ideally, we >> will have packages opt-in to follow the PVP for those packages that do >> opt-in we have the PVP enforced on hackage using the checker tool. Since >> the HP is almost certainly going to require packages to follow the PVP >> then this should eliminate this class of mistakes. But it does need the >> tool, and nobody is working on that at the moment. > > If I recall correct, CosmicRay wrote just such a thing (or similar to > it) a while ago. > > John?
Nope, that wasn't me. Maybe the other John? > > -- Don > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
